MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033535450 · doi:10.4043/23822-ms

A Constellation Of Satellites For Enhanced Mapping Of Sea Ice

2012· article· en· W2033535450 on OpenAlexaff
Malcolm Davidson, Nick Walker, C. L. Williams, Desmond Power, B. Ramsay, K.C. Partington, David G. Barber, Matt Arkett, Roger De Abreu

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstellationSea iceRemote sensingSynthetic aperture radarSatellite constellationComputer scienceSea ice concentrationEnvironmental scienceArcticGeologyCryosphereSea ice thicknessMeteorologyGeographyClimatologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In conducting safe and cost effective operations in ice prone waters, icemanagement and risk mitigation practices are integral to operations. A criticalelement in ice management is the mapping and characterisation of sea ice. Satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a standard tool used by icecharting agencies to map the extent of sea ice. Wide-swath SAR has become thepreferred sensor of choice for ice mapping and the collection of data regardingice parameters. SAR provides a high degree of information content on basic iceparameters such as concentration, type and topography. SAR can be used tocharacterise different sea ice types, such as multi-year versus first year ice, and the use of multiple SAR frequencies (L, C and X-Band) can reduceinterpretation ambiguities during the melt season. The advent ofmulti-frequency and polarization SAR systems, acting as a constellation, isseen as an important next step in the evolution of sea ice monitoring. Theevaluation of a SAR ice constellation is an interesting challenge since aquantitative evaluation is necessary. As a consequence, a sea ice backscattertool has been developed that provides a figure of merit estimation of iceclassification from a constellation scenario. The authors have used its sea-icebackscatter tool to simulate various ice constellation scenarios. Thesescenarios will be presented in the context of their utility and versatility inoil and gas operations. The implementation of a SAR ice constellation providesthe opportunity to significantly expand the ice information extractioncapabilities, over and above that of these systems acting alone. In the contextof its use within Arctic resource development, SAR constellations offerenhanced ice charting to the oil and gas industry. Index Terms—Sentinel-1, SAR, sea-ice, backscatter, constellations Introduction In conducting safe and cost effective operations in ice prone waters, icemanagement and risk mitigation practices are integral to operations. A criticalelement in ice management is the mapping and characterisation of sea ice. Satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a standard tool used by icecharting agencies to map the extent of sea ice. Wide-swath SAR has become thepreferred sensor of choice for ice mapping and the collection of data regardingice parameters. SAR provides day-night, all-weather capability and relativelyhigh resolution. Additionally, SAR can provide a high degree of informationcontent on basic ice parameters such as concentration, type and topography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207