Confirmation of a dyslexia susceptibility locus on chromosome 1p34‐p36 in a set of 100 Canadian families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dyslexia is a common and genetically complex trait that manifests primarily as a reading disability independent of general intelligence and educational opportunity. Strong evidence for a dyslexia susceptibility locus on chromosome 1p34-p36 (near marker D1S199) was recently reported, and an earlier study found suggestive evidence for linkage to the same region. We tested for the presence of a dyslexia gene in this region in a sample of 100 Canadian families using both qualitative and quantitative definitions of the phenotype. Using a qualitative definition of dyslexia (affected, unaffected, or uncertain), the largest multipoint Genehunter Maximum LOD-Score (MLS) in 100 core nuclear families was 3.65 at D1S507, distal to D1S199. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage analysis was performed for four measures of dyslexia (phonological awareness, phonological coding, spelling, and rapid automatized naming speed) employing the variance components approach implemented in Genehunter. Using a model with QTL additive and dominance variance and polygenic additive variance, the multipoint LOD scores maximized proximal to D1S199 (between D1S552 and D1S1622), with peaks of 4.01 for spelling and 1.65 for phonological coding (corresponding LOD scores under 1 degree of freedom were 3.30 and 1.13, respectively). In conclusion, our study confirms and strengthens recent findings of a dyslexia susceptibility gene on chromosome 1p34-p36 (now designated DYX8).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".