MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033616167 · doi:10.1136/emj.2009.088237

A prospective review of the use of ketamine to facilitate endotracheal intubation in the helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) setting

2010· review· en· W2033616167 on OpenAlexafffund
Aaron Sibley, Michelle Mackenzie, Jamie Bawden, Danielle Anstett, Cristina Villa‐Roel, BH Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Medicine Journal · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
FundersCanada Research ChairsHealth Research Board
KeywordsMedicineEndotracheal intubationKetamineIntubationEmergency medical servicesMedical emergencyEmergency departmentIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineAnesthesiaNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Ketamine is a dissociative agent used for sedation and intubation in various clinical settings. Despite its proven haemodynamic safety, ketamine has not been widely used in prehospital medicine. This study examined the use of ketamine in helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled all patients transported by a single HEMS program in whom ketamine was used to facilitate intubation. Data were collected using standard forms by two independent trained research staff. Demographics, medical condition, intubation conditions, vital signs (pre and post drug administration) and complications were recorded. Proportions, medians with IQR, change scores and CIs are reported; differences were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, 71 patients received ketamine to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Ketamine was used most often in men (52 (73%)), and the median age was 49 years (IQR: 31, 69). Most patients were adults (70 (99%)) with medical illnesses (42 (59%)); 37 (52%) intubations were performed at the sending hospital, and 30 (42%) were performed on scene. A paramedic performed the intubation in 58 cases (82%). The median ketamine dose was 80 mg (IQR: 60, 100; ~ 1mg/kg); 53 (75%) patients also received a paralytic agent. Mean arterial pressure (2.3 mmHg; 95% CI: -8.0 to 3.3) and heart rate (0.45 beats/min, 95% CI: -4.9 to 4.0) changes failed to reach statistical or clinical significance. No differences were found between patients with suspected concomitant head injury and other patients with respect to ketamine dose, changes in vital signs and complications. Complications included: one (1.4%) interstitial IV, five (7%) failed intubations, five (7%) hypotension and four (6%) hypertension episodes, one (1%) bradycardia, two (3%) tachycardia and five (7%) deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine is an effective agent in facilitating intubation in a HEMS environment. Complications are similar to use in the controlled Emergency Department setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Medicine JournalSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207