MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033621708 · doi:10.1017/s002202999900388x

Microbial resistance of caseinate films crosslinked by gamma irradiation

2000· article· en· W2033621708 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ressouany, Caroline Vachon, Monique Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsArmand Frappier MuseumInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShelf lifeCompatibility (geochemistry)BiodegradationFood packagingIrradiationPolymerGamma irradiationMaterials scienceWater resistanceChemistryFood sciencePolymer scienceComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need to improve the shelf life and quality of foods, combined with the urgency to reduce waste generated by synthetic non-biodegradable packaging, have resulted in an increasing interest in biodegradable or edible materials (Chen, 1995). The challenge in the development of such materials lies in achieving controlled lifetime together with compatibility with foods and the environment. Natural polymers or polymers derived from natural monomers such as food proteins offer the greatest opportunities, since their biodegradability and environmental compatibility are assured (Krochta & de Mulder-Johnston, 1997). Milk proteins such as caseins have been formulated into coatings and films for improving food quality (Baker et al. 1994). Unfortunately, the highly hydrophilic nature of these proteins limits the possibility of producing films with the required properties. Gamma irradiation, which induces the formation of crosslinks in the protein structure, is known to improve the mechanical properties and water resistance of such materials (Brault et al. 1997; Mezgheni et al. 1998a; Ressouany et al. 1998), and can also sterilize materials for possible biomedical applications (Kaetsu, 1995). Gamma irradiation is slowly becoming accepted in the food industry as a means of safely improving the shelf life of various fruits and vegetables and eliminating bacterial contamination in meats (Pszczola, 1997). All these features (sterility, increased mechanical strength, controlled life time) make gamma irradiation a promising technique for the production of commercial biodegradable films. In the present study, we have investigated the microbial resistance of calcium caseinate films irradiated at 4 or 64 kGy. A minimum dose of 4 kGy was required to produce complete sterility in the films without inducing many crosslinks in the protein. A dose of 64 kGy was used to induce maximum crosslinking density (Ressouany et al. 1998). The rate of modification of the films was evaluated using three methods. Firstly, microbiological counts were performed on films incubated with a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This strain was chosen because it produces a wide range of proteinases and is often implicated in the process of food spoilage. These results were compared with those obtained for soluble N. Since conversion to CO2 is one of the standard test procedures to assess biodegradability (El-Din Sharabi & Bartha, 1993), we also analysed the CO2 produced by the biodegradation of the crosslinked films using a modified version of a standard test procedure (American Society for Testing Materials, 1992). This measures the aerobic degradation of plastic materials inoculated with municipal sewage sludge. We have replaced the sludge by a concentrated bacterial strain (Ps. aeruginosa) and compared these results with the two previous methods. This last method was used to measure the resistance of the crosslinked films to bacterial degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ResearchSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207