An extremely SAD case: structure of a putative redox-enzyme maturation protein from<i>Archaeoglobus fulgidus</i>at 3.4 Å resolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the crystal structure of AF0173, a putative redox-enzyme maturation protein (REMP) from Archaeoglobus fulgidus. The REMPs serve as chaperones in the maturation of extracytoplasmic oxidoreductases in archaea and bacteria. The all-helical subunits of AF0173 form a dimer arising from the interaction of residues located in a funnel-shaped cavity on one subunit surface with an uncut expression tag from the other subunit. This cavity is likely to represent a binding site for the twin-arginine motif that interacts with REMPs. The conservation of the overall fold in AF0173 and bacterial REMPs as well as the presence of conserved residues in their putative binding sites indicates that REMPs act in a similar manner in archaea and bacteria despite their limited sequence similarity. A model of the binding of the twin-arginine motif by AF0173 is suggested. The solution of the AF0173 structure by the single anomalous dispersion method represents an extreme case of SAD structure determination: low resolution (3.4 A), the absence of NCS and the presence of only two anomalously scattering atoms in the asymmetric unit. An unusually high solvent content (73%) turned out to be important for the success of the density-modification procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".