Cre Induces an Asymmetric DNA Bend in Its Target loxP Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cre initiates recombination by preferentially exchanging the bottom strands of the loxP site to form a Holliday intermediate, which is then resolved on the top strands. We previously found that the scissile AT and GC base pairs immediately 5' to the scissile phosphodiester bonds are critical in determining this order of strand exchange. We report here that the scissile base pairs also influence the Cre-induced DNA bends, the position of which correlates with the initial site of strand exchange. The binding of one Cre molecule to a loxP site induces a approximately 35 degrees asymmetric bend adjacent to the scissile GC base pair. The binding of two Cre molecules to a loxP site induces a approximately 55 degrees asymmetric bend near the center of the spacer region with a slight bias toward the scissile A. Lys-86, which contacts the scissile nucleotides, is important for establishing the bend near the scissile GC base pair when one Cre molecule is bound but has little role in positioning the bend when two Cre molecules are bound to a loxP site. We present a model relating the position of the Cre-induced bends to the order of strand exchange in the Cre-catalyzed recombination reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".