The acidic ribosomal protein P2 from <i>Euplotes octocarinatus</i> is phosphorylated at its N-terminal domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The eukaryotic acid ribosomal P0, P1, and P2 proteins share a conserved flexible C-terminal tail that is rich in acidic residues, which are involved in the interaction with elongation factor 2 during protein synthesis. Our previous work suggested that the acidic ribosomal P proteins from Euplotes octocarinatus have a special C-terminal domain. To further understand this characteristic feature, both P2 and elongation factor 2 from E. octocarinatus were overexpressed, for the first time, in Escherichia coli in this study. GST pull-down assay indicated that P2 protein from E. octocarinatus (EoP2) interacted specifically with the N-terminal domain of elongation factor 2 from E. octocarinatus (EoEF-2) in vitro. The interacting part of EoP2 is in the C-terminal domains, consistent with the observation in other organisms. Phosphorylation of the recombinant EoP2 was performed in vitro using multiple methods such as (31)P-NMR spectroscopy, native PAGE, and Phos-tag(TM) SDS-PAGE. Results showed that ribosomal protein EoP2 was phosphorylated by casein kinase II at serine 21 located at the N terminus. This phosphorylation site identified in EoP2 is quite different from that of P2 from other organisms, in which the phosphorylation site is located in the conserved C-terminal region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".