52 Do The Heart Transplant Patients Ask About Their Erectile Dysfunction to the Nurse?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: There is a direct association between coronary disease and erectile dysfunction (ED). The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of patients who suffer from ED after a heart transplant and to identify the percentage of patients who consult a healthcare professional after their erectile function has decreased. Methods: Epidemiological, single centre, retrospective study. We reviewed the medical history of patients subjected to heart transplant and sexual history was completed during a single visit. The following data was obtained for each patient: demographic data and medication. ED was diagnosed by the SQUED screening interview. Results: 113 male patients who had suffered heart transplants were selected, with a mean age of 54.8 years. 92.9% of the patients were receiving concomitant treatment with corticoids, 81.4% with anti-ulcer agents and 80.5% with hypolipaemic agents. With regards to the use of immune suppressants, 79% of the patients were under treatment with cyclosporin, 72% with azathioprine, 21% with tacrolimus, 20% with mycophenolate mofetil and 8% with other immune suppressors. 18.6% of the patients suffered from diabetes mellitus, 28.6% of whom were not controlled with pharmacological treatment. 28.3% of the patients presented ED prior to surgery and 92.9% after surgery (p< 0.0001, Mc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".