Comparative study of the apical ganglion in planktotrophic caenogastropod larvae: Ultrastructure and immunoreactivity to serotonin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research suggests that a major role of the apical ganglion (also called the apical or cephalic sensory organ) in gastropod larvae is detection and integration of sensory information and relay of motor signals to effectors in the velum. However, the relative impact of ancestry versus velum size and life history on characteristics of the apical ganglion is unresolved. We address this issue by contributing data on the apical ganglion and overlying epidermis in planktotrophic larvae of four caenogastropod species (Euspira [Polinices] lewisii, Lacuna vincta, Trichotropis cancellata, and Amphissa versicolor) derived from light microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and immunohistochemical localization of serotonin-like antigenicity. Ultrastructure of the apical ganglion is similar in these caenogastropods, and the basic plan corresponds to previous descriptions of the apical ganglion in planktotrophic opisthobranch larvae (subgroup of Heterobranchia). The only identified structural feature that is unique to all these caenogastropods, relative to opisthobranchs, is modified ciliary axonemes for the ampullary cells, a distinctive type of sensory neuron. Like opisthobranch larvae, caenogastropod larvae have serotonin-immunoreactive neurons within the apical ganglion; the number ranges from three to six, but a lateral pair of serotonergic, nonsensory neurons is common to all species. The pattern of serotonergic neurons in E. lewisii, which develops large, subdivided velar lobes, is the same as that of opisthobranch larvae, which have a relatively small, unelaborated velum. These and other data suggest that common ancestry is a major determinant of overall structural design for the apical ganglion in caenogastropods and heterobranchs, which are sister groups within the Gastropoda. Velum size and life history strategy may account for some, but not all, cases of interspecific differences in the serotonergic component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".