MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033778926 · doi:10.3354/meps263235

Controls on the distribution of Browns Bank juvenile haddock

2003· article· en· W2033778926 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. Brickman

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaddockJuvenile fishJuvenileNova scotiaFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryBayWhitingOceanographyFisheries scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyFisheries managementFishingBiologyArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 263:235-246 (2003) - doi:10.3354/meps263235 Controls on the distribution of Browns Bank juvenile haddock David Brickman* Ocean Sciences Division, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, PO Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada *Email: brickmand@dfo-mpo.gc.ca ABSTRACT: A combination of biophysical modelling and data analysis is used to infer some important aspects of the southwest Nova Scotia (Canada)‹Bay of Fundy (BoF) ecosystem with respect to the first year of life of Browns Bank (BB) haddock. One of the main observations in this ecosystem is that adult fish found in the BoF region consistently exhibit a larger length-at-age than fish found in the BB region. This is generally thought to be due to drift and retention processes acting during the early life stages, with the larger fish assumed to be the result of settlement in a more favourable temperature and food environment downstream in the BoF. Also, while BB is considered to be an important juvenile nursery ground and the source for the smaller southwest Nova (SWN) fish, the existence of the larger BoF fish suggests a downstream nursery ground. To date, no analysis has been made regarding the whereabouts of such a nursery ground. The assumption of a favourable temperature and food environment in the BoF is investigated. The result of this analysis suggests that the small Œinshore¹ region off of Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, is the best settling ground. An Age-1 capture probability map is constructed from 30 yr of Canadian research vessel (RV) survey data. This map shows 3 regions where juvenile haddock are found‹BB, the inshore, and upstream (northeast) of BB. The average pelagic juvenile concentration field derived from the biophysical model predicts that BB and the inshore region are preferred settling grounds. A habitat suitability map, based on surficial sediment type, shows that the observed settling grounds coincide with preferred haddock sediment type. Finally, it is shown that the upstream Age-1 fish most likely come from larvae that drifted downstream from the Western Bank haddock spawning ground, and that BB likely acts as a potential source for the Georges Bank haddock stock. Thus, the combination of biophysical modelling and analysis of fisheries data provides evidence of the metapopulation structure of haddock stocks on the Scotian Shelf/Gulf of Maine. KEY WORDS: Metapopulation · Haddock · Biophysical model · Scotian Shelf · Larval drift · Survival Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 263. Online publication date: November 28, 2003 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2003 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207