MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033803996 · doi:10.1021/ja109817p

Energetically Important C−H···F−C Pseudohydrogen Bonding in Water: Evidence and Application to Rational Design of Oligonucleotides with High Binding Affinity

2010· article· en· W2033803996 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Yahyaee Anzahaee, Jonathan K. Watts, Nageswara R. Alla, Allen W. Nicholson, Masad J. Damha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryOligonucleotideHydrogen bondFluorinePyrimidinePurineRational designStereochemistrySequence (biology)CrystallographyComputational chemistryMoleculeDNAOrganic chemistryEnzymeNanotechnologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is controversial whether organic fluorine can form energetically important hydrogen bonds in aqueous environments. We previously showed by NMR and molecular modeling that the unexpectedly high binding affinity of 2'F-ANA is largely due to a C-H···F-C pseudohydrogen bond at pyrimidine-purine steps. Comparisons of the melting of duplexes with identical sequence composition but a rearranged sequence confirm that energetically important fluorine-mediated pseudohydrogen bonding is in operation in these sequences. The effect is of particular importance when the H-bond donor (purine H8) is activated by the presence of fluorine at its own 2'-position. These results provide a rational method to increase the binding affinity of antisense oligonucleotides by placement of 2'F-ANA modifications at pyrimidine-purine steps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207