MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033873250 · doi:10.1159/000200977

Two Weeks of Oral Synthetic E <sub>2</sub> Prostaglandin (Enprostil®) Improves the Intestinal Morphological But Not the Absorptive Response in the Rat to Abdominal Irradiation

2009· article· en· W2033873250 on OpenAlexaff
M. Keelan, K. Walker, C. I. Cheeseman, Brian Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsProstaglandin E2ProstaglandinProstaglandin EOral administrationPharmacologyInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enprostil, a synthetic E2 prostaglandin, was administered in a dose of 5 micrograms/kg body weight by gastric tube to rats for 14 days following abdominal irradiation with a single dose of 600 cGy from a 137Cs source. Enprostil prevented the body weight loss and the reduced food intake observed in irradiated animals given placebo, and also prevented the irradiation-associated decline in the mucosal weight and surface area of the ileum. Enprostil given to nonirradiated animals reduced the maximal transport rate (Vmax) and the apparent Michaelis constant (Km*) for the ileal uptake of D-glucose, but did not prevent the irradiation-associated decline in the ileal uptake of glucose. Thus, there is a dissociation of the effects of Enprostil on the morphological and the absorptive properties of the intestine. It is concluded that a 2-week course of a daily oral dose of E2 prostaglandin begun shortly after a single exposure to nonlethal abdominal irradiation prevents the radiation-associated reduction in the intestinal mucosal surface area and the animal's body weight, but does not prevent the malabsorption of glucose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestionSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207