MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033873250 · doi:10.1159/000200977

Two Weeks of Oral Synthetic E <sub>2</sub> Prostaglandin (Enprostil®) Improves the Intestinal Morphological But Not the Absorptive Response in the Rat to Abdominal Irradiation

2009· article· en· W2033873250 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsProstaglandin E2ProstaglandinProstaglandin EOral administrationPharmacologyInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enprostil, a synthetic E2 prostaglandin, was administered in a dose of 5 micrograms/kg body weight by gastric tube to rats for 14 days following abdominal irradiation with a single dose of 600 cGy from a 137Cs source. Enprostil prevented the body weight loss and the reduced food intake observed in irradiated animals given placebo, and also prevented the irradiation-associated decline in the mucosal weight and surface area of the ileum. Enprostil given to nonirradiated animals reduced the maximal transport rate (Vmax) and the apparent Michaelis constant (Km*) for the ileal uptake of D-glucose, but did not prevent the irradiation-associated decline in the ileal uptake of glucose. Thus, there is a dissociation of the effects of Enprostil on the morphological and the absorptive properties of the intestine. It is concluded that a 2-week course of a daily oral dose of E2 prostaglandin begun shortly after a single exposure to nonlethal abdominal irradiation prevents the radiation-associated reduction in the intestinal mucosal surface area and the animal's body weight, but does not prevent the malabsorption of glucose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it