Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells Using Pancreatic Bud-Conditioned Medium Gives Rise to Neuroectoderm-Derived Insulin-Secreting Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells can be differentiated into insulin-secreting cells by emulating in vitro the key processes that occur during embryonic development. However, the resulting cells are generally immature; thus, further research must be performed to identify the necessary factors to complete the differentiation. To this end, we cultured mouse embryonic stem cells with pancreatic bud-conditioned medium, based on a recent publication. Unlike in humans, mouse cells present two types of insulin, which can be used to identify different cell lineages. As a result, the cell product presented a neuroectodermal genetic expression pattern, with no expression of any definitive endodermal marker analyzed. Also, nonglucose-dependent insulin release was detected. Altogether, this previously published protocol results in neuroectoderm, and not definitive endoderm, derived insulin-positive cells. This further confirms the difficulty of obtaining true cell types of this germ layer. Finally, we identified a 16-kDa protein band that was present in pancreatic bud-conditioned medium. Sequencing this band revealed the presence of Reg proteins. The role of pancreatic bud-conditioned medium remains to be tested in definitive endoderm committed cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".