Low temperature effects on ubiquinone content, respiration rates and lipid peroxidation levels of etiolated seedlings of two differentially chilling‐sensitive species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ubiquinone functions primarily in the electron transport chain of the mitochondria of plants and animals. Secondary roles in plant tissue, such as antioxidant activity, have also been proposed. The effect of low temperature exposure on etiolated seedling embryonic axes of two differentially chilling‐sensitive species, mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) (chilling‐sensitive) and pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Lincoln) (chilling‐tolerant) with respect to respiration rate, lipid peroxidation and ubiquinone content was examined. Whole seedlings (embryonic axis and cotyledon) of both species were exposed to control temperatures (20°C) (6 days) or an acclimatory low temperature treatment of 10°C (3 days) followed by exposure at 5°C (3 days). Measurements were initiated 3 days after seedlings had reached 50% germination (D0). Prior to measurements the cotyledons were removed and only the embryonic axis was used in these experiments. Ubiquinol (UQH2), ubiquinone (UQ) and total ubiquinone (UQtot) content decreased in mung bean in response to the temperature treatment and UQH2 and UQtot remained stable in the more chilling‐tolerant pea. The reduction of the total Q‐pool was approximately 85–92%, suggesting a high degree of saturation of the respiration pathways. Respiration declined and the RQ ratio increased in both species in response to low temperature. Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) (EC 1.9.3.1) activity was higher in pea than in mung bean but decreased during low temperature exposure in both species. Considering that levels of MDA (lipid peroxidation) did not increase in either species in response to chilling, decreased levels of UQH2 and UQ observed in chilling‐sensitive mung bean may indicate that these compounds were damaged prior to other membrane lipids during low temperature treatment and rendered undetectable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".