Adhesion-Induced Unclasping of Cytoplasmic Tails of Integrin α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub><sup>,</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) plays a pivotal role in hemostasis and thrombosis by mediating adhesive interactions of platelets. Binding of alpha(IIb)beta(3) to its physiological ligands, immobilized fibrinogen and fibrin, induces outside-in signaling in platelets, leading to their adhesion and spreading even without prior stimulation by agonists. Implicit in these phenomena is a requirement for the linkage between integrins' cytoplasmic tails and intracellular proteins. However, the nature of the initiating signal has not been established. In this study, we examined whether binding of alpha(IIb)beta(3) to immobilized fibrin(ogen), per se, triggers interaction of the integrin with cytoplasmic proteins. Using the integrin-binding skelemin fragment as a marker of exposure of residues involved in the clasp between alpha(IIb) and beta(3) cytoplasmic tails, we showed that its binding site in the membrane-proximal beta(3) 715-730 segment is cryptic and becomes exposed as a result of binding of isolated alpha(IIb)beta(3) to immobilized ligands. Furthermore, the skelemin-like protein present in platelets and CHO cells does not associate with alpha(IIb)beta(3) in resting platelets or suspended alpha(IIb)beta(3)-expressing CHO cells but is recruited to integrin during cell adhesion. In addition, not only beta(3) but also the membrane-proximal 989-1000 segment of the alpha(IIb) cytoplasmic tail binds the skelemin fragment. Finally, the same residues, alpha(IIb) Val(990), alpha(IIb) Arg(995), and beta(3) His(722), involved in the formation of the clasp between the tails are also required for skelemin binding. These studies suggest that ligation of alpha(IIb)beta(3) by immobilized ligands during platelet adhesion induces a transmembrane conformation change in the integrin, resulting in unclasping of the complex between the membrane-proximal parts of cytoplasmic tails, thereby unmasking residues involved in binding the skelemin-like protein. Thus, the junction between alpha(IIb) and beta(3) cytoplasmic tails may contain the critical structural information for the initiation of outside-in signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".