MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033967651 · doi:10.1021/jo005647g

A Mild and General Solid-Phase Method for the Synthesis of Chiral Polyamines. Solution Studies on the Cleavage of Borane−Amine Intermediates from the Reduction of Secondary Amides

2001· article· en· W2033967651 on OpenAlexaff
Sukhdev Manku, Carmen Laplante, D Kopac, Timothy R. Chan, Dennis G. Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoraneChemistryAmine gas treatingAdductAmideOrganic chemistryAcetic acidCombinatorial chemistryReductive aminationCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mild oxidative workup protocol using iodine in an acetic acid-acetate buffer solution is described for the cleavage of borane-amine adducts arising from the borane-promoted reduction of polyamides supported onto practical trityl-based resins. Chiral polyamines with diverse side-chain functionalities can be generated as free bases without premature release from the solid support and with essentially no racemization using this method. A series of model oligomeric secondary diamides 6 containing various alpha-amino acid residues (Val, Phe, Tyr, Ser, Cys, Met, Gln, Trp) provided triamine products 8 in high yields and good to excellent purity. On the other hand, a substrate containing a tertiary amide (15) formed a rather unusual triaminoborane intermediate that required more stringent workup conditions to liberate the polyamine product 20. The reduction of oligomeric tertiary amides such as 9 was found sluggish, but these compounds could nonetheless be obtained in high purity from in situ reductive amination of the corresponding secondary amines. Control studies, carried out in solution with model secondary amide 23, confirmed the efficiency of the buffered iodine solution and highlighted several advantages (no heating necessary, no need for strong bases or acids) over existing methods for the cleavage of borane-amine adducts. A possible mechanism involving all buffer components (iodine, acetic acid, and acetate ion) is proposed in which borane-amine adducts are transformed first to the monoiodoborane-amine and then to the corresponding acetoxyborane-amine adduct of much weaker coordination affinity. The latter would dissociate readily and get trapped by the acetic acid to provide the desired secondary amine. This reduction/oxidative workup protocol is useful as a general method for the facile solid-phase synthesis of polyamines for eventual release in solution and use in various applications. It is also potentially very useful toward the synthesis and screening of bead-supported libraries of free oligoamines assembled through split-pool methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207