MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033967959 · doi:10.1049/el.2014.1752

Improved binary‐weighted split‐capacitive‐array DAC for high‐resolution SAR ADCs

2014· article· en· W2033967959 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Li, Yong Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingBinary numberElectronic engineeringConvertersHigh resolutionComputer scienceResolution (logic)Electrical engineeringEngineeringArithmeticRemote sensingMathematicsVoltageGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved split‐capacitive‐array digital‐to‐analogue converter (DAC) with an optimised segmentation degree (i.e. the number of bits in the most significant bit (MSB) sub‐array) is proposed to reduce the area, the switching power consumption and improve the linearity compared to a conventional binary‐weighted (CBW) capacitive‐array DAC and a conventional binary‐weighted split‐capacitive‐array with an attenuation capacitor (BWA) DAC. The presented analysis considers the area and the power dissipation from the DAC as well as the analogue‐to‐digital converter's (ADC's) dynamic performance to determine the optimum segmentation degree for the proposed split‐capacitive‐array DAC and the BWA DAC. Using the minimum matching requirement for the unit capacitor in a 12‐bit CBW DAC, the proposed split‐capacitive‐array DAC with an MSB:LSB = 8:4 segmentation reduces the input capacitance by 2× and reduces the switching power by 15× compared to the 12‐bit CBW DAC. It also improves the ADC's dynamic performance and reduces the switching power by 3.75× compared to the conventional 12‐bit BWA DAC with an MSB:LSB = 10:2 segmentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207