Position fine-tuning of caudal primary motoneurons in the zebrafish spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In zebrafish embryos, each myotome is typically innervated by three primary motoneurons (PMNs): the caudal primary (CaP), middle primary (MiP) and rostral primary (RoP). PMN axons first exit the spinal cord through a single exit point located at the midpoint of the overlying somite, which is formed beneath the CaP cell body and is pioneered by the CaP axon. However, the placement of CaP cell bodies with respect to corresponding somites is poorly understood. Here, we determined the early events in CaP cell positioning using neuropilin 1a (nrp1a):gfp transgenic embryos in which CaPs were specifically labeled with GFP. CaP cell bodies first exhibit an irregular pattern in presence of newly formed corresponding somites and then migrate to achieve their proper positions by axonogenesis stages. CaPs are generated in excess compared with the number of somites, and two CaPs often overlap at the same position through this process. Next, we showed that CaP cell bodies remain in the initial irregular positions after knockdown of Neuropilin1a, a component of the class III semaphorin receptor. Irregular CaP position frequently results in aberrant double exit points of motor axons, and secondary motor axons form aberrant exit points following CaP axons. Its expression pattern suggests that sema3ab regulates the CaP position. Indeed, irregular CaP positions and exit points are induced by Sema3ab knockdown, whose ectopic expression can alter the position of CaP cell bodies. Results suggest that Semaphorin-Neuropilin signaling plays an important role in position fine-tuning of CaP cell bodies to ensure proper exit points of motor axons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".