MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034065618 · doi:10.1644/12-mamm-a-245.1

Linking intraspecific variation in territory size, cone supply, and survival of North American red squirrels

2013· article· en· W2034065618 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jalene M. LaMontagne, Cory T. Williams, Jenna L. Donald, Murray M. Humphries, Andrew G. McAdam, Stan Boutin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam Trusts
KeywordsIntraspecific competitionEcologySpatial variabilityAbundance (ecology)BiologySpatial distributionGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In territorial species, competitive asymmetries can result in the uneven distribution of food resources as high-quality individuals force young or subordinates to occupy smaller or lower-quality sites, or both. However, spatiotemporal variation in the production of resources also can influence an individual's ability to monopolize resources and, consequently, affect survival. We examined how spatial and temporal variation in food supply affects the distribution of resources among territorial food-hoarding red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) by mapping cone production over 62.5 ha of white spruce (Picea glauca) forest and measuring the interrelationships between territory size, cone supply, and survival during 4 years of low cone abundance in Yukon, Canada. Territory size and cone production within a territory varied 10- and 520-fold, respectively, with juvenile squirrels occupying smaller territories with fewer cones. Because of small-scale heterogeneity in the distribution of cones, territory size explained low to moderate amounts of the variation in territory-wide cone production within (rs = 0.49–0.69) and across (rs = 0.31) years. Furthermore, spatial heterogeneity in cone production varied across years such that territory location was not useful for predicting relative food availability from one year to the next. Perhaps as a consequence of this heterogeneity, the number of cones within an individual's hoard was only weakly correlated with territory size (rs = 0.42) and not correlated with territory-wide cone production. Hoard size better predicted overwinter survival than did territory size, whereas cone production on a territory was not predictive of survival. We suggest that caution be used in equating territory size with food supply because small-scale spatial heterogeneity can weaken this relationship, particularly in food-hoarders. Spatiotemporal variation in food abundance, in turn, may cause high-quality territories in one year to be low-quality territories in other years, which will limit the ability of individuals to assess the long-term quality of territories at the time of settlement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MammalogySame topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207