Norbert Elias and Figurational Sociology: The Comeback of the Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Norbert Elias (1897-1990) has been recog nized belatedly in American sociology, even though the prefaces to his collected works claim he was one of the great sociologists of our time. This more British and European judgment-Elias won the first versions of both the Theodor Adorno Award (1977) and the European Amali Prize for social science (1987)-would generally as a surprise for American sociologists. Indeed, if sociol ogy were a sport, Elias would win the come back of the century award (Gordon 2002: 68). Yet as Edward Shils once pointed out, the success and visibility of sociological ideas have only a weak relationship to their enduring validity. Shils' case in point, writ ing in 1970, was that whereas Frankfurt School Critical Theory had become popular primarily because of its politics and strategic location, Karl Mannheim's soci ology had been unjustly marginalized despite its greater sociological depth (Shils 1980). Despite the tendentiousness of his comparative judgments, Shils' sociological argument about the marginalizing effects of ecological locations could be applied even more tellingly to Elias, Mannheim's onetime assistant. Ironically, however, from the per spective of critical social theory all three of these cases can now be viewed in a very dif ferent political context as more complemen tary than competing, sharing a historicist, post-empiricist conception of social theory whose post-Kantian interpretive structural ism could not be comprehended within the categories of logical empiricism and posi tivism. Following a doctorate on Kant in philoso phy, Elias became a sociology student of Alfred Weber (Max's younger brother) in Heidelberg in 1925 for his Habilitation research (necessary for a teaching position). There he also met and befriended Mannheim, becoming his assistant when he left in 1930 for a chair in Frankfurt. Though only 4 years younger than Mannheim, he had lost considerable career time because of trau matic World War I military duty and post war family economic problems. In contrast to Mannheim, however, Elias lived a long-as Early Writings, by Norbert Elias. The Collected Works of Norbert Elias, Volume 1, edited by Richard Kilminster. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Dublin, IE: University College Dublin Press/Dufour Editions, 2006. 136pp. $74.95 cloth. ISBN: 9781904558392.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".