MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034087089 · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-05-1558

Lentivector-mediated clonal tracking reveals intrinsic heterogeneity in the human hematopoietic stem cell compartment and culture-induced stem cell impairment

2003· article· en· W2034087089 on OpenAlexafffund
Frédéric Mazurier, Olga I. Gan, Joby L. McKenzie, Monica Doedens, John E. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Cancer InstituteStem Cell Network
KeywordsStem cellHaematopoiesisBiologyCompartment (ship)Hematopoietic stem cellCell cultureCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of the composition and interrelationship of the various hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that comprise the human HSC pool and the consequence of culture on each class is required for effective therapies based on stem cells. Clonal tracking of retrovirally transduced HSCs in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice revealed heterogeneity in the repopulation capacity of SCID-repopulating cells (SRCs). However, it is impossible to establish whether HSC heterogeneity is intrinsic or whether the culture conditions required for retroviral transduction induce qualitative and quantitative alterations to SRCs. Here, we report establishment of a clonal tracking method that uses lentivectors to transduce HSCs with minimal manipulation during overnight culture without cytokine stimulation. By serial bone marrow (BM) sampling of mice receiving transplants, short-term SRCs (ST-SRCs) and long-term SRCs (LT-SRCs) were identified on the basis of repopulation dynamics demonstrating that their existence is not an experimental artifact but reflects the state of the HSC pool. However, 4 days of culture in conditions previously used for SRC retroviral transduction significantly reduced SRC number as assessed by clonal analysis. These studies provide a foundation to understand the molecular and cellular determinants of human HSC development and to develop therapies targeted to specific HSC classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207