MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034094825 · doi:10.1109/icde.2014.6816638

R-Store: A scalable distributed system for supporting real-time analytics

2014· article· en· W2034094825 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Li, M. TAMER ÖZSU, Gang Chen, Beng Chin Ooi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOnline analytical processingOnline transaction processingComputer scienceScalabilityDatabaseData cubeBig dataData warehouseAnalyticsTransaction processingData miningDatabase transaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is widely recognized that OLTP and OLAP queries have different data access patterns, processing needs and requirements. Hence, the OLTP queries and OLAP queries are typically handled by two different systems, and the data are periodically extracted from the OLTP system, transformed and loaded into the OLAP system for data analysis. With the awareness of the ability of big data in providing enterprises useful insights from vast amounts of data, effective and timely decisions derived from real-time analytics are important. It is therefore desirable to provide real-time OLAP querying support, where OLAP queries read the latest data while OLTP queries create the new versions. In this paper, we propose R-Store, a scalable distributed system for supporting real-time OLAP by extending the MapReduce framework. We extend an open source distributed key/value system, HBase, as the underlying storage system that stores data cube and real-time data. When real-time data are updated, they are streamed to a streaming MapReduce, namely Hstreaming, for updating the cube on incremental basis. Based on the metadata stored in the storage system, either the data cube or OLTP database or both are used by the MapReduce jobs for OLAP queries. We propose techniques to efficiently scan the real-time data in the storage system, and design an adaptive algorithm to process the real-time query based on our proposed cost model. The main objectives are to ensure the freshness of answers and low processing latency. The experiments conducted on the TPC-H data set demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207