MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034112481 · doi:10.1002/chp.204

Advancing the global CME/CPD agenda: A collaborative approach

2008· article· en· W2034112481 on OpenAlexaffabout
Craig Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Policy and Management
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationMedicineContinuing medical educationContinuing professional developmentContinuing educationStudent affairsPolitical scienceFamily medicineProfessional developmentHigher educationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Office of Professional Affairs, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; and CME Congress Email: [email protected] The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 774 Echo Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5N8

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.100
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.096
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1000.096
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0320.021
Open science0.0080.047
Research integrity0.0370.030
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Continuing Education in the Health ProfessionsSame topicHealthcare Policy and ManagementFrench-language works237,207