MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034178926 · doi:10.1016/s1525-0016(03)00129-1

Expression of dystrophin driven by the 1.35-kb MCK promoter ameliorates muscular dystrophy in fast, but not in slow muscles of transgenic mdx mice

2003· article· en· W2034178926 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Dunant, Nancy Larochelle, Christian Thirion, Rolf Stucka, Daniel Ursu, Basil J. Petrof, Eckhard Wolf, Hanns Lochmüller

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsMuscular dystrophyDystrophinDuchenne muscular dystrophyTransgeneUtrophinGenetic enhancementBiologymdx mouseSkeletal muscleDystrophyPhenotypeGene expressionGenetically modified mouseITGA7GeneEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successful gene therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy may require the lifelong expression of a therapeutic gene in all affected muscles. The most promising gene delivery vehicles, viral vectors, suffer from several limitations, including immunogenicity, loss of therapeutic gene expression, and a limited packaging capacity. Therefore, various efforts were previously undertaken to use small therapeutic genes and to place them under the control of a strong and muscle-specific promoter. Here we report the effects of a minidystrophin (6.3 kb) under the control of a short muscle-specific promoter (MCK 1.35 kb) over most of the lifetime (4-20 months) of a transgenic mouse model. Dystrophin expression remained stable and muscle-specific at all ages. The dystrophic phenotype was greatly ameliorated and, most importantly, muscle function in limb muscles was significantly improved not only in young adult but also in aged mice compared to nontransgenic littermates. Dystrophin expression was strong in fast-twitch skeletal muscles such as tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum longus, but weak or absent in heart, diaphragm, and slow-twitch muscles. Additionally, expression was strong in glycolytic but weak in oxidative fibers of fast-twitch muscles. This study may have important implications for the design of future gene therapy trials for muscular dystrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207