Hydrogen Oxidation at the Ni/Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Interface: A Study Based on Density Functional Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new mechanism for hydrogen oxidation on the nickel/yttria-stabilized zirconia (Ni/YSZ) interface is proposed based on density functional theory. The new mechanism involves oxidation of hydrogen by the oxygen atoms that are bound to both nickel and zirconium (or yttrium) at the interface. The free energy change (Δ G ) for this pathway is compared to Δ G for reaction steps of previously proposed oxidation mechanisms involving spillover of oxygen from YSZ to nickel or hydrogen spillover from nickel to YSZ. For all mechanisms, we consider both a stoichiometric (YSZ) surface as well as an oxygen enriched YSZ surface (YSZ+O) where in the latter case a vacant site is filled by an oxygen atom transferred from the YSZ bulk. The release of water as the final product in hydrogen oxidation is facilitated at high temperatures by entropy. The difference between the current and previous mechanisms is that for the hydrogen oxidation now we only consider the involvement of oxygen atoms that are bound to both nickel and zirconium (or yttrium). In previous studies we only considered oxygen atoms that initially were bound to zirconium (or yttrium) only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".