Folic Acid Does Not Limit Endothelial Dysfunction Induced by Ischemia and Reperfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) uncoupling is a condition of increased production of superoxide anion associated with a decreased production of nitric oxide (NO) by this enzyme. Folic acid can prevent and/or reverse NOS uncoupling in the setting of diabetes, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and nitrate tolerance. Whereas animal studies showed a protective effect of folic acid in ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury, no study tested whether folic acid administration limits IR-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans. In a double-blind, parallel study, 20 healthy young male volunteers were randomized to receive folic acid, 10 mg/d for 7 days, or matching placebo. At the end of the treatment period, endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the radial artery was measured before and after IR injury (15 minutes of ischemia at the level of the brachial artery followed by 15 minutes of reperfusion). There was no difference at baseline between groups in any variable. In the placebo group, IR significantly blunted FMD (before IR, 6.7+/-1.0%; after IR, 1.5+/-1.3%, P<0.01). A similar effect was observed in the folic acid group (before IR, 6.3+/-1.1%; after IR, 2.1+/-1.0%, P=ns compared with placebo). As opposed to animal studies, high-dose folic acid does not protect the vascular endothelium from IR injury in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".