Determining the feasibility of phosphorus recovery as struvite from filter press centrate in a secondary wastewater treatment plant
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the workability of a pilot-scale, fluidized reactor was examined to determine effectiveness in removing, and recovering, phosphorus as struvite, from centrate at Lulu Island Wastewater Treatment Plant (LIWWTP), Richmond, British Columbia. The crystallization process was run continuously over a period of 5 months in two runs (Run 1 for 4 months and Run 2 for a month). In addition to efficient recovery of phosphorus as struvite, the study also investigated factors that affect the growth of struvite. Chemical analyses were conducted on the harvested struvite to determine its purity. Results showed that the reactor was capable of removing over 90% of phosphate and 4% of ammonia-nitrogen, with greater than 85% of the phosphate removed being recovered as harvestable struvite crystals. It was possible to achieve over 90% P-removal at a pH of 7.5; this is contrary to the information found in literature, which recommends that a higher pH (8.2-9.0) is required. Factors that affected phosphate removal were the operating pH, the reactor supersaturation ratio (SSR), the N:P and Mg:P molar ratios. Analysis of the harvested product showed that the crystals were composed of nearly pure struvite (96% by weight), with small amounts of calcium and traces of other metals. High resolution SEM pictures were taken of the inside of the crystals to determine the influence of Mg:P molar ratio on the compactness of the crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it