MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034277916 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab367

367 INFLUENCE OF SUPERESTIMULATION AND HORMONAL DEPRIVATION PROTOCOLS ON IN VITRO PRODUCTION OF NELORE EMBRYOS (BOS TAURUS INDICUS)

2005· article· en· W2034277916 on OpenAlex
C. M. Barros, M. M. G. Ferreira, J. R. Potiens, B. Eberhardt, D. S. Melo, Fábio Morato Monteiro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEstrous cycleFollicular phaseBlastocystEmbryoOocyteInternal medicineAndrologyEndocrinologyEmbryogenesisMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are indications in the literature that delaying the period between ovarian superestimulation and ovum pickup (OPU) will induce follicles to a condition of initial atresia, which could be beneficial to oocyte development. Blondin et al. (2002 Biol. Reprod. 66, 38–43) superstimulated (FSH) Holstein heifers and delayed OPU for 48 h, i.e. they induced initial atresia in these follicles deprived of FSH (starvation) for 48 h. Additionally, 6 h before OPU, LH was administered to accelerate follicular maturation. This protocol yielded a surprisingly high blastocyst rate (80.4 ± 9.4%). In the present work, Blondin’s protocol was simultaneously compared to other protocols used for OPU and in vitro production of embryos (IVP), in Nelore cattle. Nelore cows (n = 18) were randomly allocated in three groups: Group 1 (just OPU), Group 2 (superestimulation and OPU), and Group 3 (superestimulation associated with FSH deprivation and OPU). Three OPU were performed, and the animals were switched to a different group each time in such a way that at the end of the experiment all cows received the three protocols. At a random stage of the estrous cycle (D2), follicles =6 mm were aspirated to induce a new follicular wave 2 days afterward (D0). In Group 1, OPU was performed on D2 and oocytes were processed to IVP. In Group 2, starting on D0, cows were superestimulated (pFSH, Folltropin®, 30 mg administered daily, IM, during 3 consecutive days; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada), and 6 h after the last FSH dose they received exogenous LH (12.5 mg, Im, Lutropin®, D3; Bioniche Animal Health). OPU was performed 6 h after LH administration, i.e. 12 h after the last dose of FSH. Animals in Group 3 received the same treatment as in Group 2, except that LH was administered 36 h after the last dose of FSH, and OPU occurred 6 h later. Therefore, in this Group, follicles were deprived of FSH during 48 h. Both cleavage and blastocyst rates were similar (P > 0.05, logistic regression) among oocytes from Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively: 77.4% (144/185) and 42.70% (79/185); 75.54% (105/139) and 31.65% (44/139); 63.52% (101/159) and 33.33% (53/159). However, hatched blastocyst rate was higher (P < 0.01) in Group 1 (30.27%, 56/185) when compared to Group 2 (11.51%, 16/139) or 3 (15.72%, 25/159). It is concluded that, contrary to previous work on European breeds (taurus), ovarian superestimulation associated with deprivation of FSH and OPU (Group 3) do not increase IVP of Nelore embryos (indicus). Additionally, the highest hatched blastocyst rates were observed in oocytes from non superstimulated cows (Group 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it