Hypoalgesia to experimental visceral and somatic stimulation in painful chronic pancreatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To gain more information of the pain mechanisms in chronic pancreatitis we applied standardized experimental pain stimulation of the duodenum, oesophagus and the skin in 12 healthy controls and 13 patients with chronic pancreatitis and typical pain attacks. METHODS: Using endoscopy a guide wire was positioned into the horizontal part of the duodenum, and a probe with a distal balloon was introduced over the guide wire. Mechanical stimuli were given as tonic (38 ml/min) or phasic (increasing volume steps of 5 ml delivered for 60 s) distensions of the balloon. After stimulation of the duodenum, the distal oesophagus was stimulated with the same protocol. Finally, the skin was stimulated with 'single and repeated burst' electrical stimuli reflecting activation of peripheral and central pain mechanisms. RESULTS: The stimuli reliably evoked both painful and non-painful local and referred sensations. The patients had hyposensitivity to both tonic and phasic mechanical stimuli of the duodenum and the oesophagus (P=0.001). Hypoalgesia was also observed to single and repeated electrical skin stimuli in the patients, most evident for repeated stimuli (P=0.001). The evoked referred pain did not differ between the groups, but the patients used on average more words from the McGill Pain Questionnaire to describe the pain evoked in the duodenum (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Generalized hypoalgesia to experimental visceral and somatic stimulations was found in chronic pancreatitis. The findings suggest that the activation and modulation of central mechanisms is fundamental in pancreatic pain, and future studies should address the effect of analgesics with central effects in the treatment of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".