MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034294055 · doi:10.1159/000241371

Effect of Birth and Surfactant Treatment on Phospholipid Synthesis in the Premature Rabbit

2009· article· en· W2034294055 on OpenAlexafffund
Jill Stewart-DeHaan, LeRoy Metcalfe, Paul G.R. Harding, Göran Enhörning, Fred Possmayer

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaCanadian Lung Association
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantPhospholipidPremature birthPremature newbornLagomorphaMedicineRabbit (cipher)ChemistryBiologyBiochemistryInternal medicineGestationPediatricsPregnancyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incorporation of intraperitoneally injected 3H-glycerol and 14C-palmitate into the lipids of lung, liver and brain was examined in premature rabbits (27 days gestation, term 31) both in utero and in control or surfactant-treated neonates. With the lung, there was an increased incorporation after delivery, especially with the surfactant-treated pups. The incorporation of 3H-glycerol into liver lipids was markedly reduced after birth, particularly with the nontreated controls. The liver:lung ratios of the incorporations were decreased after delivery. In all three tissues, the relative incorporations into the individual lipids were not affected to any great extent by birth or surfactnat treatment. In lung, the disaturated and monoenoic species, respectively, of phosphatidylcholine accounted for the major proportion of the radioactivity. After birth there was a small increase in the labelling of the monoenoic species at the expense of the disaturated species with both control and surfactant-treated neonates. These observations support the proposal that surfactant treatment of the prematurely delivered neonate could be used prophylactically for the prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207