Photorefractoriness and seasonal changes in the brain in response to changes in day length in American goldfinches (<i>Carduelis tristis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined neural and gonadal responses to photoperiod in a late-summer-breeding finch, the American goldfinch (Carduelis tristis). First we measured seasonal changes in the gonads of free-living goldfinches. Next we determined whether the gonads of goldfinches held on constant long days would eventually regress spontaneously. Finally, we compared the hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) system and song-control system of breeding and postbreeding birds. The results confirm that the gonads of wild goldfinches regress in late summer and show that the gonads of goldfinches held on constant long days regress spontaneously. Thus, according to at least one criterion, goldfinches become photorefractory, like other seasonally breeding songbirds. As well, goldfinches exhibited similar seasonal changes in the brain to spring-breeding birds. There was a decrease in GnRH immunoreactivity in autumn and a strong trend towards a reduction in the size of song-control regions (although this was statistically significant for only one area). Thus, although goldfinches breed late in summer as day length declines, some of their physiological responses to changes in photoperiod are similar to those that occur in spring-breeding songbirds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".