Myocardial Performance after Transmyocardial Revascularization with CO2Laser. A Dobutamine Stress Echocardiographic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Transmyocardial laser revascularization is a treatment for patients with severe angina pectoris not eligible for conventional revascularization. The effects on myocardial function and reversible ischaemia have not been clarified. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with refractory angina not eligible for conventional revascularization were randomized 1:1 to receive continued optimal medical treatment or transmyocardial revascularization with CO(2)laser in addition to medical treatment. Dobutamine stress echocardiography examinations were performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months after randomization. The effects of transmyocardial revascularization on myocardial function and reversible ischaemia were assessed by visual interpretation of cineloops at rest and during stress in a 16-segment model. After transmyocardial revascularization resting left ventricular wall motion abnormalities increased (P<0.01), whereas wall motion during dobutamine stimulation remained unchanged. The number of probably non-viable segments increased (P<0.01) with a corresponding decrease in the number of ischaemic segments. Fewer patients had the dobutamine infusion discontinued because of chest pain after transmyocardial revascularization with laser, but the chest pain threshold did not increase significantly. CONCLUSION: Following transmyocardial revascularization, resting wall motion abnormalities worsened, wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stimulation remained unchanged and the number of probably non-viable segments increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".