MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034453610 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.442

Site assessment update at Weyburn-Midale CO2 sequestration project, Saskatchewan, Canada: New results at an active CO2 sequestration site.

2011· article· en· W2034453610 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gavin Jensen, Erik Nickel, Steve Whittaker, Ben Rostron

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaPetroleum Technology Research CentreGovernment of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaprockGeologyAnhydriteCarbon sequestrationGeochemical modelingDolostoneGeochemistryMining engineeringPetroleum engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Carbon dioxideGroundwaterSedimentary rockGeotechnical engineeringGypsumPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Weyburn Field, operated by Cenovus Energy, currently contains the largest amount of anthropogenic CO2 injected and geologically stored in the world, with over 16 million tonnes of CO2 sequestered as of June 2010. The IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project is in its Final Stage of research and is focussed on building on the results developed in Phase 1 of this study to provide a further understanding of parameters required to develop, implement and regulate carbon storage sites. One aspect of geological characterization of the storage site in this phase of research is to further develop the geological model used in Phase 1 by adding more wells and including several geological units not incorporated into the geological model of Phase 1. Additionally, improvements into the quantification of regional flow directions in and around the active CO2 injection site by using hydrologic data (pressure tests and hydrochemistry analyses) not included in the original model. These stratigraphic, pressure, hydrochemical and temperature data of flow units in a 1865 km2 area around the Weyburn Field will better define fluid movement in the injection site and assist with long-term modeling of the fate of injected CO2. Stratigraphic data from more than 900 wells are included in the current geological model including 200 newly picked wells. The Final Phase geological model includes: 1) an “altered zone” of anhydrite and dolostone at the up dip edge of the Weyburn-Midale reservoir that forms the caprock to the reservoir subjacent the regional seal formed by the Watrous Formation; 2) the Frobisher Evaporite, a variably thick anhydrite unit present at the base of the reservoir beneath the northern portion of the field; and 3) the Oungre Evaporite, an anhydrite/dolomite unit within the Ratcliffe beds present above the majority of the reservoir, all of which were not included in the Phase 1 model. Adding these units into the model required closely delineating the zero edges using isopach values, and then stacking the isopach thicknesses to proportionately fill the 3D grid while maintaining their complex morphology and accurately representing the hydrogeological flow units above and below the Midale aquifer. Core derived porosity and permeability was included in the model for the Midale and Frobisher aquifer units only as beyond these beds very little core exist. Pressure and hydrochemistry maps for the targeted aquifers (Midale, Frobisher and Ratcliffe) contain straddle tests and new wells drilled since Phase I was completed. Hydrogeological results from this study include; 1) Hydrochemistry maps which indicate large variations in total dissolved solids (TDS) within the target aquifers. The observed chemical and density variations have an influence on fluid movement; 2) Porosity and permeability models for the Midale, Frobisher, and Ratcliffe which will be used in conjunction will structure, chemistry and pressure maps help to elucidate fluid movement within the aquifers for long-term CO2 storage modeling. The permeability model for the Midale aquifer is composed of data from DSTs and core to examine the geologic variations and preferential flow paths within the injection aquifer; 3) Driving force ratio (DFR) maps forces acting on fluid movement within an aquifer and incorporate aquifer structure, TDS, temperature and pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207