Transient Kinetic Studies of Heme Reduction in <i>Escherichia coli</i> Nitrate Reductase A (NarGHI) by Menaquinol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the transient kinetics of quinol-dependent heme reduction in Escherichia coli nitrate reductase A (NarGHI) by the menaquinol analogue menadiol using the stopped-flow method. Four kinetic phases are observed in the reduction of the hemes. A transient species, likely to be associated with a semiquinone radical anion, is observed with kinetics that correlates with one of the phases. The decay of the transient species and the formation of the second reduction phase of the hemes can be fitted to a double-exponential equation giving similar rate constants, k(1) = 9.24 +/- 0.9 s(-1) and k(2) = 0.22 +/- 0.02 s(-1) for the decay of the transient species, and k(1) = 9.23 +/- 0.9 s(-1) and k(2) = 0.22 +/- 0.02 s(-1) for the formation of the reduction phase. The quinol-binding-site inhibitors 2-n-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide (HOQNO) and stigmatellin have significant and different inhibitory effects on the reduction kinetics. The kinetics of heme reduction in NarI expressed in the absence of the NarGH catalytic dimer (NarI(DeltaGH) exhibits only two kinetic phases, and the decay of the transient species also correlates kinetically with the second reduction phase of the hemes. We have also studied nitrate-dependent heme reoxidation following quinol-dependent heme reduction using a sequential stopped-flow method. HOQNO elicits a much stronger inhibitory effect than stigmatellin on the reoxidation of the hemes. On the basis of our results, we propose schemes for the mechanism of NarGHI reduction by menaquinol and reoxidation by nitrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".