MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Is Cerebral Microembolism in Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves Clinically Relevant?

2002· article· en· W2034522896 on OpenAlex
Zurab Nadareishvili, Vadim Beletsky, Sandra E. Black, Stephen E. Fremes, Morris Freedman, David Kurzman, Larry Leach, John W. Norris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroimaging · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMechanical heartCardiologyMechanical heart-valveCerebral embolismInternal medicineHeart valveEmbolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-intensity transient signals (HITS) are frequently detected by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (PHVs), but published data about their clinical relevance are controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the clinical relevance of HITS in patients with mechanical PHVs. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied patients with mechanical PHVs using TCD monitoring for microemboli detection with and without O2 inhalation. The cognitive testing of patients included the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Dementia Rating Scale, and MicroCog. RESULTS: The authors studied 36 patients (20 women, aged 58 +/- 13 years). HITS were detected in 72% of patients, with a nonsignificant increase of HITS rate in the aortic valve group (P = .07). There was no significant difference in HITS rate between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. In a multiple linear regression model, HITS rate was predicted only by younger age (P = .024). No correlation was found between HITS rate and the cognitive performance of patients. There was a significant decrease in HITS rate after 100% O2 inhalation compared to baseline levels (32.8 +/- 40.2 vs 6.1 +/- 11.3, P = .011). Subgroup analysis in asymptomatic patients confirmed this finding (P = .017), but in symptomatic patients, decreased HITS rate was not statistically significant (P = .18). CONCLUSION: Only age was a significant predictor of HITS in patients with mechanical PHVs. The lack of association between HITS, clinical symptoms, and cognitive functioning suggests that most of these signals represent harmless epiphenomena, and only HITS detected after O2 inhalation have any clinical relevance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it