MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034525706 · doi:10.1016/s1027-8117(10)60008-0

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia—response to long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and pulsed dye laser: a case report

2010· article· en· W2034525706 on OpenAlexaff
Luan Chen, Tsung‐Hua Tsai, Ying‐Jui Chang, Lin‐Hui Su, Yu‐Ling Hsu, Jung‐Yi Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologica Sinica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFar Eastern Memorial HospitalCathay General Hospital
KeywordsTelangiectasiaMedicineDermisPapillary dermisNd:YAG laserLaserDye laserDermatologyScarsAngiomaSurgeryPathologyVascular diseaseOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia (UNT) is a rare disease characterized by punctuate and stellate telangiectasias that follow dermatomal distribution.1 Its etiology remains elusive; no standard treatment currently exists. We describe a 14-year-old Asian female (skin type IV) with UNT, who underwent treatment with long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser for her disease. The patient came to our clinic with linearly arranged, punctate telangiectasias over right side of back, shoulder, and arm (Figure 1). The lesions appeared at the age of 10. The diagnosis of UNT was made based on the clinical manifestations and telangiectasias in superficial dermis (as shown on a histologic exam done previously at another hospital). Angioma serpiginosum is an important differential diagnosis of UNT in this case. Three sessions of treatment with long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser (GentleYAG Laser; Candela Laser, Wayland, MA, USA) were given with parameters (fluence-spot sizepulse width) of 240 J/cm2-3 mm-10 ms (first week), 240 J/ cm2-3 mm-10 ms (second week), and 280 J/cm2-3 mm-10 ms (third week). The interval between each session was 4 weeks. However, there was only slight improvement. Histologic exam performed 2 weeks after the third session revealed marked telangiectasias in papillary dermis (Figure 2). Next, two sessions of pulsed dye laser with 595 nm wavelength (Vbeam Perfecta; Candela Laser) were given with parameters of 13 J/cm2-7 mm-40 ms (fluence-spot sizepulse width) for both sessions. Significant lightening of lesions (> 90%) was observed after the second session (Figure 3). The only adverse reaction was transient purpura that lasted for approximately 2 weeks. There was no hypoor hyper-pigmentation after treatment. There are two forms of UNT, the rarer congenital form and the more common acquired form.2 Telangiectasia develops during puberty in most of the acquired cases, as in our patient. Several reports point out the systemic association of acquired UNT, such as hyperestrogenemia and chronic liver disease.2 In out patient, there was no evidence of high serum level of estrogen or hepatic disease. Both long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and pulsed dye laser have been shown to be effective in treating vascular lesions.3,4 Major et al3 reported good response with the former for facial and leg telangiectasias. However, it does not seem to be a good treatment modality for UNT for the current case. One possible explanation is that while the 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser beam tends to penetrate to deeper dermis, due to its long wavelength and lesser absorption Figure 1 Clinical picture before treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologica SinicaSame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207