Solubility of thioindigo dopants in a smectic liquid crystal host evaluated by <sup>2</sup>H NMR spectroscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solubility of two partially deuterated thioindigo dopants in a smectic liquid crystal host was evaluated by variable temperature 2H NMR spectroscopy and polarized microscopy. 2H NMR spectra showed that the dopant (±)-6,6'-bis(2-octyloxy)-5,5-dinitrothioindigo-d 6 forms a homogeneous solution with the smectic phases of the liquid crystal host (±)-4-(4-methylhexyloxy)phenyl 4-decyloxybenzoate (PhB) up to its saturation point of 3 mol %. These results are consistent with polarized microscopy observations of the dopant crystallizing out of solution upon reaching a concentration of 3 mol %. On the other hand, 2H NMR spectra of (±)-5,5'-dichloro-6,6'-bis(2-octyloxy)thioindigo-d 6 dissolved in PhB showed evidence of a partitioning of the solution between smectic and isotropic microdomains, which increases with increasing dopant concentration—from 1.2 to 9.1 mol %. To a large extent, this smectic/isotropic microphase separation could not be detected by polarized microscopy. These results suggest that 2H NMR spectroscopy can provide a more accurate determination of the occurrence and extent of microphase separation in doped liquid crystal samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it