MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034666807 · doi:10.1021/bi010445f

Thermodynamic Analysis of the Binding of Aromatic Hydroxamic Acid Analogues to Ferric Horseradish Peroxidase

2001· article· en· W2034666807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIsothermal titration calorimetryFerricHorseradish peroxidaseEnthalpyHemePeroxidaseHydroxamic acidStereochemistryBinding siteTitrationCrystallographyInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryEnzymeBiochemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peroxidases typically bind their reducing substrates weakly, with K(d) values in the millimolar range. The binding of benzhydroxamic acid (BHA) to ferric horseradish peroxidase isoenzyme C (HRPC) [K(d) = 2.4 microM; Schonbaum, G. R. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 502-511] is a notable exception and has provided a useful tool for probing the environment of the peroxidase aromatic-donor-binding site and the distal heme cavity. Knowledge of the underlying thermodynamic driving forces is key to understanding the roles of the various H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions in substrate binding. The isothermal titration calorimetry results of this study on the binding of aromatic hydroxamic acid analogues to ferric HRPC under nonturnover conditions (no H(2)O(2) present) confirm the significance of H-bonding interactions in the distal heme cavity in complex stabilization. For example, the binding of BHA to HRPC is enthalpically driven at pH 7.0, with the H-bond to the distal Arg38 providing the largest contribution (6.74 kcal/mol) to the binding energy. The overall relatively weak binding of the hydroxamic acid analogues to HRPC is due to large entropic barriers (-11.3 to -37.9 eu) around neutral pH, with the distal Arg38 acting as an "entropic gate keeper". Dramatic enthalpy-entropy compensation is observed for BHA and 2-naphthohydroxamic acid binding to HRPC at pH 4.0. The enthalpic loss and entropic gain are likely due to increased flexibility of Arg38 in the complexes at low pH and greater access by water to the active site. Since the Soret absorption band of HRPC is a sensitive probe of the binding of hydroxamic acids and their analogues, it was used to investigate the binding of six donor substrates over the pH range of 4-12. The negligible pH dependence of the K(d) values corrected for substrate ionization suggests that enthalpy-entropy compensation is operative over a wide pH range. Examination of the thermodynamics of binding of ring-substituted hyrazides to HRPC reveals that the binding affinities of aromatic donors are highly sensitive to the position and nature of the ring substituent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it