MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034697966 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2002.9669970

Ghana: Industrial Development in the Post-Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) Period

2002· article· en· W2034697966 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Peter Arthur

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersWorld Bank Group
KeywordsPromotion (chess)DebtStructural adjustmentPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)BusinessEconomic policyEconomic growthEconomyEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses Ghana's economic and industrial promotion efforts in the post-structural adjustment program (SAP) period. Although International Financial Institutions (IFIs) like the World Bank and IMF once hailed Ghana as an economic success after the implementation of the SAP, it later became obvious that the SAP did not improve the socio-economic condition of the country. To deal with Ghana's continued economic decline even after implementing the SAP, as well as get debt relief from its creditors, the government decided to opt for the Heavily Indebted and Poor Country (HIPC) status in March 2001. Despite the perceived benefits derived from joining the HIPC initiative, this paper argues that industrial and economic development will only be realized when a sound industrial development policy is put in place to complement the debt relief that Ghana will enjoy under the HIPC initiative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicEconomic Theory and PolicyFrench-language works237,207