Comparative survey of early embryogenesis of Secernentea (Nematoda), with phylogenetic implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insight into the evolution of class Secernentea (Nematoda) for the purpose of providing a phylogenetic context for the model Caenorhabditis elegans is being gained from the use of molecular character sets. Such phylogenies provide a framework for mapping the evolution of diversity in some early-development characters for 70 species and 19 families of Secernentea. These characters include (i) whether AB and P1 blastomeres initially develop at the same (synchronous) or different (asynchronous) rates, (ii) whether AB and P1 are initially aligned along the linear axis of the embryo (tandem pattern) or obliquely (rhomboidal pattern), and (iii) whether the founder germ cell, P4, is established early, i.e., by the sixth cleavage, or later. Evolutionary polarity of characters was evaluated through outgroup comparisons. From our data the following inferences are made. The derived character, late establishment of P4, evolved primarily in the ancestor of the monophyletic groups Diplogastrina, Rhabditina, and Panagrolaimidae. Asynchronous development is convergent, defining one clade of Tylenchina as well as Cephalobina, and also arising independently in Aphelenchina. The rhomboidal embryo is ancestral to the tandem-pattern embryo that defines a second clade of Tylenchina. Early-embryo characters are congruent with the polyphyly of Cephalobina and Aphelenchina, as has been demonstrated by molecular phylogenies. Many aspects of early embryogenesis, rather than being highly conserved, evolve at a rate appropriate to defining taxa within Secernentea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".