Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 on Bone Density during Distraction Osteogenesis of the Rabbit Mandible
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the quality of bone generation in distraction osteogenesis of the rabbit mandible is enhanced by administering recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 7 (rhBMP-7) to the lengthened site at the end of the distraction phase. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study of 24 rabbits undergoing distraction osteogenesis of the mandible, followed by injection of rhBMP-7 or a lactate buffer. SETTINGS: McGill University animal care facility. METHODS: Twenty-four white New Zealand rabbits underwent unilateral mandibular osteotomy and application of an Orthofix uniplanar M-100 fixator (Orthofix Inc., Verona, Italy) to the mandible. Mandibular distraction was carried out for 3 weeks. The animals were divided into three groups: group 1 (eight rabbits), control group: distraction, no injection; group 2 (eight rabbits), study group: distaction + injection of 200 microg of rhBMP7-lactate buffer; group 2 (eight rabbits), comparison group: distraction + injection of lactate buffer. All rabbits were sacrificed 7 weeks after surgery. The mandibles underwent radiology and bone densitometry analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiology assessment of bone generation within distracted segments and objective analysis of bone mineral density. RESULTS: Radiology confirmed the presence of bone generate within distraction sites. Densitometry showed a difference in bone mineral density among the three groups (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Local injection of a single dose of 200 microg of rhBMP-7 did enhance bone density when compared with the control group, although not in a statistically significant way when analyzed by an x-ray bone densitometer. This study serves as a starting point for future studies in bone tissue engineering by guiding the strategic administration of rhBMPs and the use of new state-of-the-art technologies, such as micro CT scanning, to analyze in a more detailed way, the effects of rhBMP administration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".