Isocapnic Hyperpnoea Shortens Postanesthetic Care Unit Stay After Isoflurane Anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective controlled clinical trial of the effect of isocapnic hyperpnoea (IH) on the times-to-recovery milestones in the operating room (OR) and postanesthetic care unit (PACU) after 1.5 to 3 hours of isoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty ASA grade I-III patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery were randomized at the end of surgery to either IH or the conventional recovery (control). Six patients with duration of anesthesia of <90 minutes were excluded from the analysis. The anesthesia protocol included propofol, fentanyl, morphine, rocuronium, and isoflurane in air/O(2). Unpaired t tests and analyses of variance were used to test for differences in times-to-recovery indicators between the two groups. RESULTS: The durations of anesthesia in IH and control groups were 140.8 + or - 32.7 and 142 + or - 55.6 minutes, respectively (P = 0.99). The time to extubation was much shorter in the IH group than in the control group (6.6 + or - 1.6 (SD) vs. 13. 6 + or - 3.9 minutes, respectively; P < 0.01). The IH group also had shorter times to eye opening (5.8 + or - 1.3 vs. 13.7 + or - 4.5 minutes; P < 0.01), eligibility for leaving the OR (8.0 + or - 1.7 vs. 17.4 + or - 6.1 minutes; P < 0.01), and eligibility for PACU discharge (74.0 + or - 16.5 vs. 94.5 + or - 14.7 minutes; P < 0.01). There were no differences in other indicators of recovery. CONCLUSION: IH accelerates recovery after 1.5 to 3 hours of isoflurane anesthesia and shortens OR and PACU stay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".