MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034856831 · doi:10.1071/rdv23n1ab214

214 EFFECT OF LONG-DISTANCE TRANSPORTATION OF OVARIES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF IN VITRO-MATURED–IN VITRO-FERTILIZED–IN VITRO-CULTURED BOVINE EMBRYOS

2010· article· en· W2034856831 on OpenAlexaff
M. Kanae, K. Hisaichi, S. Jaswant, Doi Osamu

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyOocyteEmbryo cultureBiologyIn vitro maturationReproductive technologyFolliculogenesisZygoteCryopreservationEmbryoIn vitroEmbryogenesisMedicineCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keeping ovaries for a long time before oocyte recovery affects the maturation rate and blastocyst rate (BL rate), but a change in the temperature of the ovary at the time of transportation does not affect the BL rate (Ribeiro et al. 2008 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 108, 171–179). The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of long-distance transportation of ovaries on the in vitro development of bovine oocytes into blastocysts. Ovaries in the transportation group (Group T) were collected from a slaughterhouse, placed inside a Thermos flask, and transported to the laboratory within 17 to 21 h. The Thermos flask was covered with a freezer pack in a foam polystyrene box (Nakatate et al. 2006 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 193). The temperature of the Thermos flask was measured with a temperature recorder. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) were collected by aspirating 2- to 6-mm follicles from the ovaries. The COC were matured in TCM-199 supplemented with 5% calf serum and 0.02 AU mL–1 of FSH. Groups of 20 COC were incubated in 100-µL drops of IVM media at 38.5°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air for 20 h. After 18 h of gamete co-culture (3 × 106 sperm mL–1), the presumptive zygotes were cultured in CR1aa medium supplemented with 5% calf serum for 9 days at 38.5°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2. Embryonic development was evaluated at 48 h after IVF (total cleavage rates, CL rate) and on Days 7 to 9 (BL rate). The ovaries in the control group (Group C) were collected from a slaughterhouse different from that of the Group T ovaries and transported to the laboratory in saline (23°C) in a Thermos flask within 3 h. These ovaries were then used for the collection of COC in the same way as for Group T. Data were analysed by chi-square test. A total of 25 experiments were performed using the ovaries from Groups C and T (n = 3945 v.n = 7218). The CL rate and the BL rate for Group T were significantly lower than those for Group C (41.8 v. 62.0% and 16.1 v. 29.7%; P < 0.01). In Group T, the duration of ovary transportation did not affect the CL rate (within 19 h, between 19 and 20 h, and more than 20 h), but the BL rate was significantly decreased with an increase in transport time (18.7 v. 16.1 v. 14.8%). The temperature change in the Thermos flask during transportation ranged from 12.0 to 25.1°C; the temperature was maintained virtually constant or decreased. The CL rates of the groups that underwent a temperature (t) change (t = 5.0 and 5.0 < t = 10.0) were not significantly different, but the BL rate in the group with 5.0 < t = 10.0 was significantly lower than that of the other group (16.7 v. 13.5%; P < 0.01). These results suggest that the long-distance transportation of ovaries affects in vitro embryo development. Moreover, a decrease in temperature during transportation may have an adverse effect on blastocyst formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207