A DFT Study of the Thermal, Orbital Symmetry Forbidden, Cyclophanediene to Dihydropyrene Electrocyclic Reaction. Predictions to Improve the Dimethyldihydropyrene Photoswitches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The orbital symmetry forbidden thermal electrocyclic equilibria between a series of cyclophanedienes and dimethyldihydropyrenes (CPD<==>DDPs) were studied using density functional theory (DFT). These reactions are important not only because of their fundamental interest but also in how they restrict the potential utility of the DDP photoswitches by limiting the thermal lifetime of the CPDs. The transition states (TSs) for these reactions could not be modeled using restricted DFT (RB3LYP) but were located using unrestricted DFT (UB3LYP). Each TS possesses significant biradical character as indicated by their spin contaminated wave functions, S2 not = 0. Specific substitution by nitrile or trifluoromethyl group(s) is predicted to strongly affect the magnitude of the activation barriers for these reactions. In particular, replacing the internal methyl groups of the CPDs/DDPs with nitrile groups is predicted to have the maximum effect and to raise the activation barriers and lifetimes of the CPDs considerably.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".