MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035013874 · doi:10.1186/cc5324

The effects of adaptive pressure ventilation–synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure-controlled synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation on pulmonary mechanics and arterial gas analyses during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2007· article· en· W2035013874 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Murat Akbaba, Melek Tulunay, Özlem Selvi Can, Zekeriyya Alanoğlu, S. Yalçin

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Surgery and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBayer Canada
KeywordsMedicineIntermittent mandatory ventilationVentilation (architecture)AnesthesiaLaparoscopic cholecystectomyIntensive care medicineMechanical ventilationSurgeryMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypercapnia and elevated intraabdominal pressure from carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) pneumoperitoneum can adversely affect respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases. We tested the hypothesis that adaptive pressure ventilation–synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (APV-SIMV) may provide better pulmonary mechanics, CO 2 homeostasis and pulmonary gas exchanges with less frequent ventilatory settings (tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR)) and lower peak inspiratory pressure ( P peak ) and plateau pressure ( P plat ) than pressure-controlled synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (P-SIMV) in patients undergoing laparocopic cholecystectomy (LP). The study group consisted of 40 patients (APV-SIMV n = 20, P-SIMV n = 20). LP was performed under total intravenous anesthesia. After induction of anesthesia, a RR of 12 breaths/minute, and an inspiratory:expiratory rate of 1:2 and PEEP of 6 cmH 2 O were set for both groups. APV-SIMV was started with a target TV of 8 ml/kg. P-SIMV was started with the inspiratory pressure ( P ins ) that will provide 8 ml/kg TV. The settings were changed until target parameters to maintain normocapnia and normoxia were achieved (ETCO 2 30–35 mmHg, PaCO 2 35–45 mmHg and SaO 2 >90%). When the target parameters could not be achieved, the first RR was increased by 2 breaths/minute up to 16 breaths/minute, then the volume or pressure was titrated to induce 1 ml/kg increases in TV up to 10 ml/kg. The initial FiO 2 was set to 50%. FiO 2 was increased with increments when the SaO 2 fell below 90%. PaO 2 /FiO 2 , static compliance, VD/VT, P peak and P plat , ETCO 2 , inspiratory and expiratory resistances, and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded before, during and after pneumoperitoneum. Statistical analysis were carried out using the chi-square test, paired test and independent samples test when appropriate. Demographic data were similar between groups. Pneumoperitoneum caused significant decreases in static compliance and arterial pH, and increases in P peak and P plat , VD/VT and ETCO 2 in both groups. However, APV-SIMV resulted in fewer setting changes, lower peak and plateau pressures, VD/VT, and ETCO 2 levels when compared with P-SIMV ( P < 0.025). APV-SIMV may provide better results then conventional P-SIMV in patients undergoing LP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207