The Study on the Fixed Nitrogen and Nitrogenase Activity in the Day-Round of Azotobacter and Azosprillum Grown with Maize in KamphaengSaen Soil Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine not only the activity of the nitrogenase enzyme, the fixed nitrogen in the day-round of Suwan 5 maize when inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum lipoferum but also the correlation between the nitrogenase activity and total fixed nitrogen. The statistical arrangement was 3 × 4 factorial in completely randomized design with 4 replications. The first factor was inoculation (Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum and non-inoculation (control)). The second factor was the observation time of nitrogenase activity (6:00, 12:00, 18:00, 24:00 hr.). The data were collected at 4 and 6 weeks. The results showed that the different time in a day-round did not affect the nitrogenase activity. Inoculation of azotobacter gave the highest total soil nitrogen at 4 and 6 week. (729.77 and 750.47 mg/10 kg-soil) while, the highest total plant nitrogen was found as inoculated with azospirillum (159.11 and 840.35 mg/plant of 4 and 6weeks). However, the total fixed nitrogen of azotobacter and azospirillum treatments were in the same level. Azotobacter treatment gave higher nitrogenase activity in soil than that of azospirillum treatment, while that in plant it was lower. The total nitrogenase activities of both inoculums were not different during the time of this study. The bulk (over all) correlation of total fixed nitrogen and total nitrogenase activity at week 4 and 6 were linear equations as y = 0.0224x + 18.045, R2= 0.8687 and y = 0.0117x + 14.57, R2= 0.7604 respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".