PINNIPED LACTATION STRATEGIES: EVALUATION OF DATA ON MATERNAL AND OFFSPRING LIFE HISTORY TRAITS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract Interspecific correlations are commonly used to explore the adaptive functions of life history traits in pinnipeds. Although adaptive conclusions are improved by the use of comparative methods that account for underlying phylogenetic relationships among species, they are still dependent on the quality of life history data. We collected pinniped species estimates for 12 maternal and offspring life history traits and evaluated these estimates based on sample size, duration of study, and methods used to obtain the data. Although excellent data exist for some species, high‐quality estimates in all 33 species are not available for any of the traits studied. High‐quality estimates of maternal postpartum mass are known for 12 species, neonate birth mass for 21, pup rate of mass gain for 12, lactation length for 10, and weaning mass for 10. High‐quality estimates of milk composition, milk energy output, and maternal foraging behavior during lactation are limited to ≤ 50% of species, with a taxonomic bias favoring the larger phocid species. Obtaining data on small‐bodied phocid species will be critical to gaining a better understanding of the relative roles of body size and phylogeny in the evolution of pinniped lactation strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it