MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035150420 · doi:10.1093/brain/awu200

Reply: Is nucleus accumbens atrophy correlated with cognitive symptoms of Parkinson’s disease?

2014· letter· en· W2035150420 on OpenAlexaff
Oury Monchi, Alexandru Hanganu

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleus accumbensParkinson's diseaseAtrophyNeuroscienceStriatumDopamineDiseasePsychologyBasal gangliaVentral striatumMedicineInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, We thank Dr Mavridis for this very thoughtful comment about nucleus accumbens atrophy in patients with Parkinson’s disease from a neurosurgical point of view. Indeed it had been previously reported that dopamine loss also occurs in the nucleus accumbens of patients with Parkinson’s disease especially at the advanced stages (Farley et al. , 1977). Different groups, including our own have shown that patients with Parkinson’s disease are affected differently on functions relying on the ventral versus the dorsal striatum …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207