MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035237507 · doi:10.1177/0021998302036013582

Experimental Characterization of Interlaminar Shear Strengths of Graphite/Epoxy Laminated Composites

2002· article· en· W2035237507 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Zhang, Suong V. Hoa, Rajamohan Ganesan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialEpoxyBridging (networking)Shear (geology)Finite element methodFiberGraphiteComposite numberShearing (physics)Structural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation is conducted to study the effects of fiber orientations on the interlaminar shear (ILS) strengths of CYTEC ® G40-800/5276-1 graphite/epoxy laminated composites. The results of this investigation are going to be reported in two separate parts; experimental characterization and stochastic simulation. The present paper demonstrates the experimental program and the experimental results. The ILS strengths at the θ-interfaces (θ=0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90°), around which the two neighboring plies have a fiber orientation difference angle, are experimentally measured using the modified double notch shear specimens with an elaborately designed lay-up. Because of the potentially considerable scatter in the matrix-dominated ILS strengths, each data set at a specified interface is obtained through a larger sample with 35 specimens. A 3D finite element analysis is also performed to aid in the design of the multi-directional laminated composite specimens, so as to minimize the edge effects and obtain a relatively uniform stress state in the specimen gage sections. The experimental results show that not only the mean values but also the probability distribution forms of ILS strengths depend on the fiber orientations of the neighboring plies around the interfaces. Five failure modes are also found by observing the fracture surfaces; i.e., interface crack, in-ply crack, crack jumping, fiber bridging, and fiber breakage. The inherent relationships between the failure modes and the probability distributions of ILS strengths are studied on the basis of rank-sum test. The general forms of the individual probability density functions corresponding to each experimental data set are determined by means of the maximum entropy technique and verified by Kolmogorov–Smirnov good-of-fit test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composite MaterialsSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207