MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035314965 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.705

Oscillation Flow Induced by Underwater Supersonic Gas Jets from a Rectangular Laval Nozzle

2015· article· en· W2035314965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleNeckingMechanicsJet (fluid)SupercavitationOverall pressure ratioMaterials scienceSupersonic speedFlow (mathematics)Discharge coefficientShock waveOscillation (cell signaling)Structural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringCavitationChemistryThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In present work, direct measurements of the interfacial behavior of water-submerged gas jets, with nozzle operated in over-expansion to highly under-expansion conditions, were performed using high-speed digital photography. The experimental results show that the two low-frequency oscillations, which are so called jet necking/bulging and necking/back-attack phenomenon, are also found in the region near present rectangular nozzle exit.As the nozzle pressure ratio increased, two distinct flow regimes can be observed: One that showed unstable gas/water interfacial characteristics for nozzle pressure ratio, NPR or Po/Pa≤ 10.17 when the jet pattern showed similar shape as the one issuing from axisymmetric nozzles, and the other with stable jet pattern for NPR > 18.48 when a 3D cross-like cross section jet gas/water boundary started to form and grow from the nozzle exit. Finally, numerical analysis on shockwave structures of the experimental nozzle models was carried out, and the submerged jet gas/water interface characteristics show good agreement with the jet boundaries predicted by numerical simulations. The numerical results indicate that the over-expanded flow in the four corner regions as well as the recompression shock wave may play a dominant role in the interface instability to result in necking/bulging and necking/back-attack phenomenon during over-expanded to slightly under-expanded conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it